El Sexting no siempre es deseado: consecuencias sobre la satisfacción y el papel de la coerción sexual y la victimización sexual en línea.
Resumen
La comprensión del sexting como una nueva forma de comunicación interpersonal es cada vez mayor; sin embargo, poco se sabe sobre si la incidencia, correlatos y resultados del sexting varían en función de si se realiza de forma voluntaria o no. En este estudio no experimental, nos proponemos investigar la prevalencia, los predictores y las consecuencias del sexting entre 310 jóvenes españoles, que completaron una encuesta online sobre sus experiencias previas de sexting deseado y no deseado, coerción sexual y victimización sexual online, así como sus niveles de satisfacción sexual y vital. Los resultados mostraron que la mitad y un tercio de la muestra habían estado involucrados en comportamientos de sexting deseados y no deseados, respectivamente. Además, la coerción sexual y la victimización sexual online predijeron una mayor probabilidad de participar en conductas sexuales no deseadas y, con ello, una disminución de la satisfacción vital. Por último, haber experimentado mayor coerción sexual se asoció con menor satisfacción vital al aumentar la probabilidad de sufrir victimización sexual online y de participar en conductas adicionales de sexting no deseado. Nuestros hallazgos muestran la importancia de discernir entre el sexting deseado y el no deseado y cómo el hacerlo de forma diferente condiciona los predictores y las consecuencias de este fenómeno.
Descargas
Citas
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Nappa, M. R., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2021). A bad romance: Sexting motivations and teen dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13-14), 6029–6049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518817037
Brodie, Z. P., Wilson, C., & Scott, G. G. (2019). Sextual intercourse: Considering social–cognitive predictors and subsequent outcomes of sexting behavior in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2367–2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w
Cabañero-Martínez, M. J., Richard-Martinez, M., Cabrero-Garcia, J., Orts-Cortés, M. I., Reig-Ferrer, A., & Tosal-Herrero, B. (2004). Reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale of Diener in pregnant and puerperium women. Psicothema, 16(3), 448–455.
Choi, H., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2016). Association between sexting and sexual coercion among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.10.005
Cornelius, T. L., Bell, K. M., Kistler, T., & Drouin, M. (2020). Consensual sexting among college students: the interplay of coercion and intimate partner aggression in perceived consequences of sexting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197141
Davison, S. L., Bell, R. J., LaChina, M., Holden, S. M., & Davis, S. R. (2009). The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(10), 2690–2697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01406.x
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Döring, N. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, Special issue: Internet and Sexuality, 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9
Drouin, M., Coupe, M., & Temple, J. R. (2017). Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends… Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018
Drouin, M., Ross, J., & Tobin, E. (2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001
Drouin, M. & Tobin, E. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412–418. Doi 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
Englander, E. (2015). Coerced sexting and revenge porn among teens. Bullying, Teen Aggression & Social Media, 1(2), 19–21.
Expósito, F., Moya, M. C., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: medition and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347498760350641
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fest, R., Reer, F., & Quandt, T. (2019). Online sexual engagement and psychosocial well-being: The mediating role of sexual victimization experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.010
Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., Siliman, S. A., Perry, B. L., Coe, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Sexting among singles in the USA: Prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images. Sexual Health, 13(5), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15240
García-Cueto, E., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Bringas-Molleda, C., López-Cepero, J., y Paíno-Quesada, S. (2015). Development of the Gender Role Attitudes Scale (GRAS) amongst young Spanish people. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.10.004.
Galovan, A. M., Drouin, M., & McDaniel, B. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017
Gámez-Guadix, M., Almendros, C., Borrajo, E., & Calvete, E. (2015). Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among Spanish adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9
Gámez-Guadix, M., De Santisteban, P., & Resett, S. (2017). Sexting among Spanish adolescents: Prevalence and personality profiles. Psicothema, 29(1), 29–34. Doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.222
Gámez-Guadix, M., & Mateos-Pérez, E. (2019). Longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between sexting, online sexual solicitations, and cyberbullying among minors. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.004
Garrido-Macías, M., Villanueva-Moya, L., Alonso-Ferres, M., Sánchez-Hernández, M. D., Badenes-Sastre, M., Beltrán-Morillas, A. M., Herrera, A., Expósito, F., & Herrera, M. C. (2021). Sexting during confinement in Spain: prevalence, motivations and predictor variables. Studies in Psychology, 42(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2021.1950460
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
Katz, J., & Myhr, L. (2008). Perceived conflict patterns and relationship quality associated with verbal sexual coercion by male dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(6), 798–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313949
Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2009). Women’s sexual compliance with male dating partners: Associations with investment in ideal womanhood and romantic well-being. Sex Roles, 60(5), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9566-4
Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2010). Going along with it: Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex. Violence Against Women, 16(7), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210374867
Kernsmith, P. D., Victor, B. G., & Smith-Darden, J. P. (2018). Online, offline, and over the line: Coercive sexting among adolescent dating partners. Youth & Society, 50(7), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18764040
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Clancy, E., Mellor, D. J., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2019). Sexting and psychological distress: The role of unwanted and coerced sexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(4), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0291
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., Ullman, S., West, C., & White, J. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
Krieger, M. A. (2017). Unpacking ‘‘Sexting’’: A systematic review of nonconsensual sexting in legal, educational, and psychological literatures. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016659486
Lawrance, K.-A., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
Lu, Y., Baumler, E., & Temple, J. R. (2021). Multiple forms of sexting and associations with psychosocial health in early adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18052760
Marengo, D., Settanni, M., & Longobardi, C. (2019). The associations between sex drive, sexual self-concept, sexual orientation, and exposure to online victimization in Italian adolescents: Investigating the mediating role of verbal and visual sexting behaviors. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.04.023
Marganski, A., & Melander, L. (2018). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(7), 1071–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614283
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.
Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L., & Chirumbolo, A. (2016). Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema, 28(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.193
Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N., Rash, R., & Madigan, S. (2020). The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
Oriza, I. I. D., & Hanipraja, M. A. (2020). Sexting and sexual satisfaction on young adults in romantic relationship. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 3(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v3i1.61
Parker, T. S., Blackburn, K. M., Perry, M. S., & Hawks, J. M. (2013). Sexting as an intervention: Relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.635134.
Quesada, S., Fernández-González, L., & Calvete, E. (2018). El sexteo (sexting) en la adolescencia: Frecuencia y asociación con la victimización de ciberacoso y violencia en el noviazgo [Sexting in adolescence: Frequency and association with victimization of cyberbullying and dating violence]. Behavioral Psychology, 26(2), 225–242.
Reyns, B. W., Burek, M. W., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). The unintended consequences of digital technology: Exploring the relationship between sexting and cybervictimization. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2011.641816
Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Lameiras-Fernández, M., Carrera-Fernández, M. V., & Alonso-Ruido, P. (2017). Violence in the dating relationships of Galician teenagers. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 2, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.02.2277
Ross, J. M., Drouin, M., & Coupe, A. (2019). Sexting coercion as a component of intimate partner polyvictimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(11), 2269–2291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516660300
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., Byers, E. S., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction questionnaire in a Spanish sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(9), 1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00224499.2014.989307
Schmiedeberg, C., Huyer-May, B., Castiglioni, L., & Johnson, M. D. (2017). The more or the better? How sex contributes to life satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0843-y
Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2004). Men’s sexual coercion in intimate relationships: development and initial validation of the sexual coercion in intimate relationships scale. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1891/ vivi.19.5.541.63681
Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Basile, K. C., Gilbert, L. K., Merrick, M. T., Patel, N., Walling, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Stasko, E. C., & Geller, P. A. (2015). Reframing sexting as a positive relationship behavior. American Psychological Association, 6–9. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apa.org%2Fnews%2Fpress%2Freleases%2F2015%2F08%2Freframing-sexting.pdf
Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2015). The conditional importance of sex: Exploring the association between sexual well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.811450
Thomas, M. F., Binder, A., & Matthes, J. (2021). Sexting during social isolation: Predicting sexting-related privacy management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-3-3
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Heirman, W. (2015). The association between adolescent sexting, psychosocial difficulties, and risk behavior: Integrative review. The Journal of School Nursing, 31(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840514541964
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., De Marez, L., Vanhaelewyn, B., & Ponnet, K. (2021). Sexting, pressured sexting and image-based sexual abuse among a weighted-sample of heterosexual and LGB-youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106630
Walker, K., Sleath, E., Hatcher, R. M., Hine, B., & Crookes, R. L. (2021). Nonconsensual sharing of private sexually explicit media among university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36 (17-18), 9078–9108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519853414
Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2016). Sextortion: Findings from a survey of 1,631 victims. NH: Crimes Against Children Research Center & Thorn.
Woloski-Wruble, A. C., Oliel, Y., Leefsma, M., & Hochner-Celnikier, D. (2010). Sexual activities, sexual and life satisfaction, and successful aging in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(7), 2401–2410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01747.x
Wood, M., Barter, C., Stanley, N., Aghtaie, N., & Larkins, C. (2015). Images across Europe: The sending and receiving of sexual images and associations with interpersonal violence in young people's relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.005
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2012). Kicking the digital dog: A longitudinal investigation of young adults’ victimization and cyber-displaced aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0061
Derechos de autor 2023 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
