Psychometric properties of the Recovery Experiences Questionnaire in Argentine workers.

  • Mario Trógolo Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Luis Morera Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Estanislao Joaquín Castellano Universidad Siglo 21
  • Carlos Spontón Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Leonardo Adrián Medrano Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba (Argentina); Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
Keywords: recovery, questionnaire, validity, reliability, workers.


The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire in Argentina. Five-hundred and five workers from public, private and non-governmental sectors participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model has acceptable fit to the data. Thus, as the original scale, the Argentinean validation maintain the four recovery experiences—psychological detachment from work, relaxation, mastery experiences and control over leisure time. Reliability analyses showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ranging from .75 to .92) and construct reliability (coefficient H ranging from .88 to .93) for all subscales. Correlations theoretically expected with measures of work engagement, burnout and negative affect supported for concurrent validity. Thus, the Recovery Experience Questionnaire shows adequate psychometric properties for its use in Argentina, make available a reliable instrument that allows deepening knowledge about recovery and providing a valuable tool for professional practice.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mario Trógolo, Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina

Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina

Luis Morera, Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina

Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina

Carlos Spontón, Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina

Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina

Leonardo Adrián Medrano, Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba (Argentina); Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

Universidad Siglo 21, Córdoba (Argentina). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina


Almén, N., Lundberg, H., Sundin, Ö., & Jansson, B. (2018). The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. Nordic Psychology, 1–10.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). La teoría de las demandas y los recursos laborales. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 29(3), 107–115. doi:10.5093/tr2013a16

Bakker, A., Sanz-Vergel, A., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Oerlemans, W. (2015). The state version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire: A multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 350–359.

Carod-Artal, F. J., & Vázquez-Cabrera, C. (2012). Burnout Syndrome in an International Setting. Burnout for Experts, 15–35. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4391-9_2

Chahín-Pinzón, N. (2014). Aspectos a tener en cuenta cuando se realiza una adaptación de test entre diferentes culturas. Psychologia: Avances de la Disciplina, 8, 109–112.

Colombo, V., & Cifre Gallego, E. (2012). La importancia de recuperarse del trabajo: Una revisión del dónde, cómo y por qué. Papeles del psicólogo, 33, 129–137.

De Bloom, J., Geurts, S. A., & Kompier, M. A. (2013). Vacation (after-) effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation activities, experiences and sleep. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 613-633.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Geurts, S., & Taris, T. (2009). Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. Current Perspectives on Job-stress Recovery. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, 7, 85–123.

Dominguez-Lara, S. (2016). Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el Coeficiente H: Breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones. Psychologia. Avances de la Disciplina, 10, 87–94.

Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 577–585. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.577

Fritz, C., Sonnentag, S., Spector, P., & McInroe, J. (2010). The weekend matters: Relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1137–1162.

Fritz, C., Yankelevich, M., Zarubin, A., & Barger, P. (2010). Happy, healthy, and productive: The role of detachment from work during nonwork time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 977–983.

Garrosa, E., Carmona-Cobo, I., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2015). El impacto emocional del incivismo laboral y el abuso verbal en el trabajo: influencia de la recuperación diaria. Anales de Psicología, 31(1). doi:10.6018/analesps.31.1.161491

Geurts, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 482–492.

Hahn, V. C., Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2011). Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 202.

Hobfoll, S. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and physiology of stress. New York, NY: Plenum.

Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Siltaloppi, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 805–832.

Li, C. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949.

Autor (Año).

Meijman, Th., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. En P. J. Drenth & H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 5–33). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Gálvez Herrer, M. (2013). El efecto del distanciamiento psicológico del trabajo en el bienestar y la satisfacción con la vida: un estudio longitudinal. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29, 145–151.

Autor (Año)

Mostert, K., & Els, C. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire of employees in a higher education institution. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 25, 37–43. 330237.2014.997006

Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. México: McGraw-Hill.

Park, H., Park, Y., Kim, M., & Hur, T. (2011). A validation study of a Korean version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24, 523–552.

Parkinson, B., & Totterdell, P. (1999). Classifying affect-regulation strategies. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 277–303.

Ready, R., Weinberger, M., & Jones, K. (2007). How happy have you felt lately? Two diary studies of emotion recall in older and younger adults. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 728–757.

Robinson, M., & Clore, G. (2002). Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960.

Rodriguez-Ayan, M., & Sotelo Rico, M. (2015). Validación de la versión en español del Mathematics Value Inventory (MVI) entre estudiantes universitarios uruguayos.
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28, 678–689.

Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Sebastián, J., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Garrosa, E., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). Adaptación del" Cuestionario de Experiencias de Recuperación" a una muestra española. Psicothema, 22, 990–996.

Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International, 14, 204─220.

Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory ─ General Survey. En C. Maslach, S. Jackson, & M. Leiter (Eds.), The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Test Manual (3º Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

Shimazu, A., Matsudaira, K., De Jonge, J., Tosaka, N., Watanabe, K., & Takahashi, M. (2016). Psychological detachment from work during non-work time: linear or curvilinear relations with mental health and work engagement? Industrial Health, 54, 282–292.

Shimazu, A., Sonnentag, S., Kubota, K., & Kawakami, N. (2012). Validation of the Japanese version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health, 54, 196–205.

Siltaloppi, M., Kinnunen, U., & Feldt, T. (2009). Recovery experiences as moderators between psychological work characteristics and occupational well-being. Work & Stress, 23, 330–348.

Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196–210.

Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 114–118.

Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221. /

Sonnentag, S., & Geurts, S. (2009). Methodological issues in recovery research. En S. Sonnentag, P. Perrewé & D. Ganster (Eds.), Currents perspectives on job-stress recovery (pp. 1–36). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Sonnentag, S., & Zijlstra, F. (2006). Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 330–350.

Sonnentag, S., Binnewies, C., & Mojza, E. (2008). "Did you have a nice evening?" A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep, and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 674–684.

Sonnentag, S., Kuttler, I., & Fritz, C. (2010). Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: A multi-source study on the benefits of psychological detachment. Journal of vocational Behavior, 76(3), 355-365.

Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E., Binnewies, C., & Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work & Stress, 22, 257–276.

Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A. (2017). Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 365-380.

Autor (Año)

Autor (año)

Ten Brummelhuis, L., & Bakker, A. (2012). Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 445–455.

Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Ames: The University of Iowa.

Wendsche, J., & Lohmann-Haislah, A. (2017). A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–24

Yu, C., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical Report). Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
How to Cite
Trógolo, M., Morera, L., Castellano, E. J., Spontón, C., & Medrano, L. A. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Recovery Experiences Questionnaire in Argentine workers. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 36(1), 181-188.
Social and Organizational Psychology