Influencia del hongo arbuscular micorrícico en el crecimiento y arquitectura radicular en suelo tropical modificado con fosforita
Resumen
Ensayamos la influencia del homgo micorrícizo arbuscular (AM) Scutellospora calospora en la estructura, crecimiento, asimilación de nutrientes, actividad fosfatasa y dependencia micorrizal en maíz por adicción de 0-5% de fosforita (RP) en suelos deficientes de fósforo (P). La adicción de RP aumentó significativamente la longitud total de la raíz, número de raíces a diferentes niveles y diámetro de los pelos radiculares de las plantas AM. El hongo AM influyó positivamente el crecimiento del maíz y la asimilación de nutrientes. Las actividades fosfatasa ácida y alcalina fueron mayores en suelos mejorados. Al aumentar las concentraciones RP se redujo no linealmente el porcentaje de colonización del hongo AM. Entonces, la inoculación de hongos AM junto a la mejora de fósfoso proveniente de RP podría sustituir fertilizantes químicos y hacer disponible el P proveniente de RP.
Descargas
Citas
Abdel-Fattah GM. 2001. Measurement of the viability of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi using three different stains; relation to growth and metabolic activities of soybean plants. Microbiological Research 156: 359−367.
Arcand MM & Schneider KD. 2006. Plant- and microbial-based mechanisms to improve the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock: a review. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 78: 791−807.
Ayoob M, Aziz I & Jite PK. 2011. Interaction effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and different phosphate levels on growth performance of Catharanthus roseus Linn. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 3: 75−79.
Bagyaraj DJ, Sharma MP & Maiti D. 2015. Phosphorus nutrition of crops through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Current Science 108: 1288-1293.
Baligar VC, Wright RJ & Hern JL. 2005. Enzyme activities in soil influenced by levels of applied sulfur and phosphorus. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36: 1727−1735.
Barea JM & Richardson AE. 2015. Phosphate mobilisation by soil microorganisms. In: Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions (Lugtenberg B, ed.). Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 225-234.
Berta G, Sgorbati S, Solar V, Fuscone A, Trotta A, Citerio A, Bottone MG, Sparvoli E & Scannerini S. 1990. Variation in chromatin structure in host cell nuclei of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal. New Phytologist 114: 199−205.
Bethlenfalvay GJ, Bayre HG & Pacovsky S. 1983. Parasitic and mutualistic associations between a mycorrhizal fungus and soybean: the effect of phosphorus on host plant endophyte interactions. Physiologia Plantarum 57: 543−548.
Cardoso Filho JA, Lemos EEP, Santos TMC, Caetano LC & Nogueira MA. 2008. Mycorrhizal dependency of mangaba tree under increasing phosphorus levels. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43: 887-892.
Cavagnaro TR, Smith FA, Ayling SM & Smith SE. 2003. Growth and phosphorus nutrition of a Paris-type arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 157: 127-134.
Chandra Gandhi K, Priyadharsini P & Muthukumar T. 2017. Potassium fertilization influences indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal formation and function in a tropical Alfisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48: 524-538.
Costa NL, Townsend CR, Magalhães JA, Paulino VT, Rodrigues ANA, Nascimento LES & Rodrigues MJA. 2015. Response of Andropogon gayanus cv. Planaltina to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and rock phosphate fertilization. Pubvet 9: 405−408.
Dickson S, Smith SE & Smith FA. 1999. Characterization of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Allium porrum: inflow and flux of phosphate across the symbiotic interface. New Phytologist 144: 173−181.
Dreyer B, Honrubia M & Morte A. 2014. How root structure defines the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and what we can learn from it? In: Root Engineering. Soil Biology (Morte A & Varma A, eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 145-169.
Feldmann F & Idczak E. 1992. Inoculum production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for use in tropical nurseries. In: Methods in Microbiology (Norris JR, Read DJ & Varma AK, eds.). Academic Press, London, pp. 799−817.
Frey B & Schüepp H. 1993. Acquisition of nitrogen by external hyphae of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi associated with Zea mays L. New Phytologist 124: 221−230.
Hochholdinger F & Tuberosa R. 2009. Genetic and genomic dissection of maize root development and architecture. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 12: 172-177.
Jackson ML. 1971. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall.
Kaeppler SM, Parke JL, Mueller SM, Senior L, Stuber C & Tracy WF. 2000. Variation among maize inbred lines and detection of quantitative trait loci for growth and low phosphorus and responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crop Science 40: 358−364.
Kaldorf M & Müller LJ. 2000. AM fungi affect the root morphology of maize by increasing indole-3-butyric acid biosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum 109: 58−67.
Khade SW, Rodrigues BF & Sharma PK. 2010. Arbuscular mycorrhizal status and root phosphatase activities in vegetative Carica papaya L. varieties. Acta Physiologia Plantarum 32: 565−574.
Khalil S, Lognachan TE & Tabatabai MA. 1994. Mycorrhizal dependency and nutrient uptake by improved and unimproved corn and soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal 86: 949−958.
Kojima T, Hayatsu M & Saito M. 1998. Intraradical hyphae phosphatase of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Gigaspora margarita. Biology and Fertility of Soils 26: 331−335.
Lindsay WL & Norvell WA. 1978. Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42: 421−428.
Maherali H. 2014. Is there an association between root architecture and mycorrhizal growth response? New Phytologist 204: 192-200.
McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL & Swan JA. 1990. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 115: 495−501.
Muthukumar T & Prakash S. 2009. Arbuscular mycorrhizal morphology in crops and associated weeds in tropical agro-ecosystems. Mycoscience 50: 233-239.
Muthukumar T & Tamilselvi V. 2010. Occurrence and morphology of endorhizal fungi in crop species. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 12: 593-604.
Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K & Rajeshkannan V. 2001. Response of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) to indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, phosphate-solubilizing and asymbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria under tropical nursery conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 34: 417-426.
Nakhro N & Dkhar MS. 2010. Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on microbial populations and biomass carbon in paddy field soil. Journal of Agronomy 9: 102-110.
Ndungu-Magiroi KW, Waswa B, Bationo A, Okalebo JR, Othieno C, Herrmann L & Lesueur D. 2015. Minjingu phosphate rock applications increase the population of phosphate solubilising microorganisms with a positive impact on crop yields in a Kenyan Ferralsol. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 102: 91-99.
Newman EI. 1966. A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 3: 139−145.
Niu YF, Chai RS, Jin GL, Wang H, Tang CX & Zhang YS. 2012. Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review. Annals of Botany 112: 391−408.
Oliveira Júnior JQ, Jesus EC, Pereira MG, Camara R, Fonseca Júnior AM & Sousa ACO. 2017. Dependency and response of Apuleia leiocarpa to inoculation with different species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2017;41:e0160174. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20160174
Plenchette C, Fortin JA & Furlan V. 1983. Growth responses on several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P fertility. I. Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant and Soil 70: 199−209.
Raisei F & Ghollarata M. 2006. Interactions between phosphorus availability and an AM fungus (Glomus intraradices) and their effects on soil microbial respiration, biomass and enzyme activities in a calcareous soil. Pedobiologia 50: 413−425.
Ramirez R, Mendoza B & Lizaso JI. 2009. Mycorrhiza effect on maize P uptake from phosphate rock and superphosphate. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40: 2058−2071.
Sadasivam S & Manickam A. 1992. Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. New Delhi, India: Willey Eastern Limited.
Smith SE & Read DJ. 2008. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd edition. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
Sorenson JN, Larsen J & Jakobsen I. 2005. Mycorrhiza formation and nutrient concentration in leeks (Allium porrum) in relation to previous crop and cover crop management on high P soils. Plant and Soil 273: 101−114.
Takács T, Osztoics E, Csathó P, Csillag J, Rajkai‐Végh K, Magyar M & Lukács A. 2006. Comparative effects of rock phosphates on arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Trifolium pratense L. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37: 2779-2790.
Tawaraya K. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of different plant species and cultivars. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 49: 655-668
Wahid F, Sharif M, Steinkellner S, Khan MA, Marwat KB & Khan SA. 2016. Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate solubilizing bacteria in the presence of rock phosphate improves phosphorus uptake and growth of maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany 48: 739−747.
Wang C, White PJ & Li C. 2017. Colonization and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in maize roots at different depths in the soil profile respond differently to phosphorus inputs on a long-term experimental site. Mycorrhiza 27: 369-381.
Zangaro W, Nishidate FR, Vandresen J, Andrade G & Nogueira MA. 2007. Root mycorrhizal colonization and plant responsiveness are related to root plasticity, soil fertility and successional status of native woody species in Southern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23: 53-62.
Derechos de autor 2017 Anales de Biología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.