NATIVE LANGUAGE INFLUENCE IN LEARNERS'. ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH FOCUS

Authors

  • M. L. Garcia Lecumberri
Keywords: accent, focus, native languaje influence, foreign leamers

Abstract

Accentual focus is a frequent linguistic device in English which may also be used in Spanish but less widely and less frequently. Given this disparity, it was expected that native language influence would manifest itself in FL leamers' focus assessrnents as cornpared to native English speakers. Other factors were also expected to account of listener perceptions, such as task type and linguistic competence. Two focus domains were used to test hypotheses: utterance initial and utterance medial focus. Focus identification was tested using two tasks which differed in their cognitive demands: multiple choice and open questions. Acceptability was estirnated by asking listeners to rate utterances on a five point scale. English NL listeners displayed better focus identification rates as cornpared to FL learners. This result may be understood both as an effect of native competence advantage and also as a reflection of native language influence. Both listener groups found utterance initial focus easier to identi@ and considered it to be more acceptable than medial focus. Both groups showed worse results in the open test, which is interpreted as a consequence of this task being more demanding on listeners' explicit knowledge. These trends were much more pronounced amongst FL leamers. It is suggested that the potential ambiguity of English medial focus is partly responsible for the bias against it. Additionally, Spanish listeners results show the their NL influence in this bias as well as in the good results for initial focus and acceptability estirnations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

M. L. Garcia Lecumberri

Universidad del Pais Vasco
Published
08-01-2009
How to Cite
Garcia Lecumberri, M. L. (2009). NATIVE LANGUAGE INFLUENCE IN LEARNERS’. ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH FOCUS. International Journal of English Studies, 1(1), 53–71. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/47601