@article{Melogno_Courtoisie_2019, title={Stepping into the 60s: Tomas Kuhn’s intellectual turn towards the Philosophy of Science}, url={https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/262961}, DOI={10.6018/daimon/262961}, abstractNote={<p>In 1975 Kuhn publishes <em>The Copernican Revolution</em>, and in 1962<em> The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.</em> Most commentators believe both works to be an expression of the same philosophical project. Against this interpretation, we argue that there is a lack of continuity between both books, arising from the fact that between 1957 and 1958 Kuhn comes into contact with the works of Hanson, Wittgenstein and Feyerabend, whose influence marks a break from his previous work. We also suggest that in 1957 Kuhn applies a <em>casuistical historiography</em>, and, in 1962, a <em>structural historiography</em>. We conclude that there is no relationship of continuity between Kuhn’s first two works.</p>}, number={76}, journal={Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia}, author={Melogno, Pablo and Courtoisie, Agustín}, year={2019}, month={ene.}, pages={23–33} }