La Identificación del talento verbal y matemático: la relevancia de las medidas fuera de nivel
Resumen
El presente estudio tiene dos objetivos principales. Por una parte, se ofrece una revisión conceptual de la literatura junto con los trabajos realizados en España por los autores acerca del modelo de identificación del talento, conocido en la literatura internacional como Talent Search model o Talent Search concept. Este modelo creado por J.C. Stanley en los EE.UU. a principios de los 70 ha dado lugar a un inmenso desarrollo en la detección del talento verbal y matemático de los jóvenes, con el objeto de ofrecerles ayudas educativas adecuadas a su capacidad. Lejos de ser un modelo americano, en este trabajo mostramos, y este es el segundo objetivo, a través de los datos de varios años de aplicación del modelo en España, que puede considerarse un modelo universal que, apoyado entre otros en el principio de la medición por encima de nivel (above or out of level), permite discriminar adecuadamente la capacidad diferencial de los alumnos que, al ser medidos solo con pruebas de nivel, su verdadera capacidad queda enmascarada. Se ofrecen algunas sugerencias para el uso a gran escala de estos procedimientos en las escuelas.Descargas
Citas
Benbow, C. P. (1986). SMPY's 15 years of Research in a Nutshell. In J. VanTassel-Baska, (Ed.), The Richardson Study: A Catalyst for Policy Change in Gifted Education. Evanston, IL: Center for Talent Development (Northwestern University).
Benbow, C. P. (1991). Mathematically Talented Children: Can Acceleration Meet Their Educational Needs? En N. Colangelo& G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic Achievement in Mathematics and Science of Students between Ages 13 and 23: Are there Differences among Students in the Top one Percent of Mathematical Ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 51-61.
Benbow, C. P. & Lubinski, D. (1993). Psychological Profiles of the Mathematically Talented: Some Sex Differences and Evidence Supporting Their Biological Basis. In G. R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The Origins and Development of High Ability. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Benbow, C. P. & Lubinski, D. (1997). Intellectually Talented Children: How Can We Best Meet Their Needs? In N. Colangelo& G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brody, L. E. (1999). The Talent Searches: Counselling and Mentoring Activities. In N. Colangelo& S. G. Assouline (Eds.), Talent Development III. Proceedings from the 1995 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Scottsdale, Arizona: Gifted Psychology Press.
Brody, L. E. (2009a). Personalized Programs for Talent Development: The Johns Hopkins Model for Meeting Individual Needs. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh, LeadingChange in Gifted Education: The Festschrift of Dr. Joyce Van Tassel Baska. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Brody, L. E. (2009b). The Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model for Identifying and Developing Exceptional Mathematical and Verbal Abilities. In L. V. Shavinina, (Ed), International Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer.
Brody, L. E. & Stanley, J. C. (2005) Youths who Reason Exceptionally well Mathematically and/or Verbally: Using the MVT: D4 Model to Develop their Talents. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds), Conceptions of Giftedness (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brody, L. E.; Stanley, J. C.; Barnett, L. B.; Gilheany, S.; Tourón, J. & Pyryt, M. C. (2001). Expanding the Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model Internationally. Gifted and Talent International, 16(2), 94-107.
CTY (1995).Academic Acceleration: Knowing your Options. Baltimore, Md: CTY Publications and Resources, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Duckworth, A. L. & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and Grit: Related but Separable Determinants of Success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319-325.
Dweck, C. (2008). Mindset: the New Psychology of Success. New York: Ballantione cop.
Ericsson, K. A. (2007). Deliberate Practice and the Modifiability of Body and Mind: Toward a Science of the Structure and Acquisition of Expert and Elite Performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38, 4-34.
Gagné, F. (2009). Building Gifts into Talents: Detailed Overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane, & T. Stambaugh, (Eds.), Leading Change in Gifted Education:The Festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Gagné, F. (2015). From Genes to Talent: the DMGT/CMTD Perspective. Revista de Educación, 368, pp. 12-37.
Goldstein, D., Stocking, V. B. & Godfrey, J. J. (1999). What We've Learned from Talent Search Research. In N. Colangelo& S. G. Assouline. Talent Development III.Proceedings from the 1995 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Scottsdale, Arizona: Gifted Psychology Press.
Jackson, N. E. & Butterfield, E. C. (1986).A Conception of Giftedness Designed to Promote Research. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keating, D. P. (1974). The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. En J. C. Stanley; D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox, (Eds.) Mathematical Talent. Discovery, Description, and Development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Keating, D. P. (Ed.) (1976). Intellectual Talent. Research and Development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Keating, D. P. & Schaefer, R. A. (1975). Ability and Sex Differences in the Acquisition of Formal Operations.Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 531-532.
Keating, D. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1972). Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science. Educational Researcher, 1, 3-7.
Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years. Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-345.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. & Sanders, C. E. (1993).Reconceptualising Gender Differences in Achievement among the Gifted. In K. A. Heller; F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent. London: Pergamon Press.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later. PsychologicalScience, 25, 2217–2232.
OCDE (2005). La definición y selección de competencias clave. Resumen ejecutivo [Definition and selection of keycompetences. Executivesummary]. In http://www.OECD.org/edu/statistics/deseco. RetrievedJanuary the 30th, 2015.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Talent Search: Purposes, Rationale, and Role in Gifted Education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(3), 106-113.
Olzewski-Kubilius, P.; Subotnik, R. & Worrell, F. (2015). Rethinking Giftedness: A Developmental Approach. Revista de Educación, 368, 245-267.
Pfeiffer, S. (2015).Tripartite Model of Giftedness and Best Practices in Gifted Assessment.Revista de Educación, 368, 156-182.
Pressey, S. L. (1949). Educational Acceleration: Appraisal and Basic Problems. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press.
Renzulli, J. & Geasser, A. (2015). A Multi Criteria System for the Identification of High Achieving and Creative/Productive Giftedness.Revista de Educación, 368, 92-121.
Reyero, M. & Tourón, J. (2003). El Desarrollo del Talento. La aceleración como estrategia educativa.[TalentDevelopment. Acceleration as EducationalStrategy]. A Coruña: Netbiblo, 416 pp.
Stanley, J. C. (1974). Intellectual Precocity. in J. C. Stanley; D. P. Keating & L. H. Fox, (Eds.), Mathematical Talent. Discovery, Description, and Development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1977). Introduction. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George & C. H. Solano, (Eds.), The Gifted and the Creative. A Fifty Year Perspective 1925-1975. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1989). Guiding Gifted Students in Their Academic Planning. In J. VanTassel-Baska, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius, (Eds.). Patterns of Influence in Gifted Learners: the Home, the Self and the School. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1990a). Finding and Young People with Exceptional Mathematical Reasoning Ability. In M. AT. Howe (Ed.), Encouraging the Development of Exceptional Skills and Talents. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
Stanley, J. C. (1990b). LetaHollingworth's Contributions to Above-Level Testing of the Gifted.Roeper Review, 12(3), 166-171.
Stanley, J. C. (1991). SMPY's Identification, Motivation, and Educational Facilitation Model. In R. E. Clasen, Educating Able Learners: Book of Readings. Madison, WI: Madison Education Extension Programs, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the Beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow, & D. Lubinski, Intellectual Talent. Psychometric and Social Issues. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanley, J. C. (2001). Helping Students to Learn what They Don’t Already Know. Proceedings from the 1998 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
Stanley, J. C. (2005). A Quiet Revolution: Finding Boys and Girls who Reason Exceptionally well Intellectually and Helping them get the Supplemental Educational Opportunities they Need. High Ability Studies, 16(1), 5-14.
Stanley, J. C. & Benbow, C. P. (1983). Extremely Young College Graduates: Evidence of Their Success. College and University, 58, 361-371.
Stanley, J. C. & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths Who Reason Exceptionally Well Mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson, (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stanley, J. C. & Brandt, R. S. (1981). On Mathematically Talented Youth: A Conversation with Julian Stanley. Educational Leadership, 39(1), 101-106.
Stanley, J. C. & George, W. C. (1978). Now We Are Six: The Ever-Expanding SMPY. Gifted Child Today, 1, 9-11.
Tourón, J. (2001). School and College Ability Test (SCAT) Validation in Spain: Overview of the Process and some Results. Gifted and Talented International, 16(2), 104-107.
Tourón, J. (2005) (Ed.). The Center for Talented Youth Model.Special Issue. High Ability Studies, 16 (1), 1-158.
Tourón, J. (2009). El establecimiento de estándares de rendimiento en los sistemas educativos [AchievementStandardsimlementation in EducationSystems]. EstudiossobreEducación, 16, 127-146.
Tourón, J. & Reyero, M. (2002). The Implementation of the Talent Search Concept in Spain.NATO Science, Volume No. 977925, 63-76.
Tourón, J.& Santiago, R. (2013). Atención a la diversidad y desarrollo del talento en el aula. El modelo DT-PI y las tecnologías en la implantación de la flexibilidad curricular y el aprendizaje al propio ritmo [AttentiontoDiversity and TalentDevelopment in the Classroom. The DT-PI Model in theImplementation of Curricular Flexibility and Self-paced Learning]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, año LXXI, nº 256, 441-459.
Tourón, J. & Santiago, R. (2015). The Flipped Learning Model and Talent Development in Schools.Revista de Educación, 368, pp. 176-208.
Tourón, J. & Tourón, M. (2006). La identificación del talento verbal y matemático de los jóvenes más capaces: el modelo de CTY España [Identification of Verbal and MathTalent of the more able: CTY Spainmodel]. I Simposio Internacional sobre Altas capacidades. Consejería de educación. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Noviembre.
Tourón, J. & Tourón, M. (2011). The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature. Talent Development & Excellence, 3(2), 187–202
Tourón, J. Tourón, M. & Silvero, M. (2005). The Center for Talented Youth Spain: an Initiative to Serve Highly Able Students. High AbilityStudies, 16(1), 121-135.
Tourón, J.; Peralta, F. & Repáraz, Ch. (1998). La superdotación intelectual. Modelos, identificación y estrategias educativas [IntellectualGiftedness. Models, Identification and Educational Strategies]. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
