What are people saying when they report they are happy or life satisfied
The study of happiness was dominated with the model of subjective well-being. With the advent of positive psychology the eudaimonic and hedonic models entered the field, but major surveys continue to use single-item measures of life satisfaction or happiness. We study the associations between life satisfaction and happiness, measured single-items with a graphic representation of a ladder and a thermometer, and three models of happiness: the subjective well-being, the eudaimonic and hedonic. The results showed that subjective well-being was the main predictor of life satisfaction and hedonic model also predicted a small amount of this variable. For happiness the predictors were the same but in reversed order, the main predictor was the hedonic model and a small variance was explained by subjective well-being. Contrary to our hypothesis the eudaimonic perspective of happiness was not a predictor in none of the models. These results underline the importance of the interaction between a cognitive or appraisal perspective and the hedonic perspectives for the study of happiness.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 139-150. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139
Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., & Croudace, T. J. (2010). An evaluation of the precision of the measurement of Ryff’ psychological well-being scales in a population sample. Social Indicators Research. 97, 357-733. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9506-x
Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 347–355. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.
Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. In J. P. Forgas, & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 189–203). North-Holland: Elsevier.
Asano, R., Igarashi, T., & Tsukamoto, S. (2014). The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities (HEMA) in Japan: the pursuit of well-being. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 85, 69-79. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.69
Bartels, M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective well-being. Behavior Genetics, 39, 605–615. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9294-8
Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research. 99, 183-203. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9
Benjamin, D. J., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M. S., & Rees-Jones, A. (2012). What do you think would make you happier? What do you think you would choose? American Economic Review, 5, 2083-2110. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.5.2083
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2011). Building a neuroscience of pleasure and well-being. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 1–3. doi:10.1186/2211-1522-1-3
Boyce, C. J., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Personality prior to disability determines adaptation: agreeable individuals recover lost life satisfaction faster and more completely. Psychological Science, 22, 1397-1402. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421790
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, aging, health and wellbeing around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53-72. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100, 185-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103-157. doi: 10.1007/BF01207052
Diener, E. (1995). A value based index for measuring national quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 36, 107-127. doi: 10.1007/BF01079721
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness, and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590-597. doi: 10.1037/a0029541
Diener, E. (2013). The remarkable changes in the science of subjective well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 663-666. doi: 10.1177/1745691613507583
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Kesebir, P., & Lucas, R. (2008). Benefits of accounts of well-being — for societies and for psychological science. Applied Psychology, 57, 37–53. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00353.x
Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61. doi: 10.1037/a0018066
Diener E, Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497-527. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x
Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 135–149. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12136
Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2010). Income’s association with judgments of life versus feelings. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., MacCulloch, R. (2010). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76, 834–852 76, doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.016
Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41, 409-427. doi: 10.1017/S0047279411000833
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94-122. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001.
Fava, G. A., & Tomba, E. (2009). Increasing psychological well-being and resilience by psychotherapeutic methods. Journal of Personality, 77, 1903-1934. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00604.x
Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 1029-1075. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.4.1029
Fordyce, M. W. (1977). Development of a program to increase personal happiness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 511-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0220.127.116.111
Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of the research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Research Indicators, 20, 355-381. doi: 10.1007/BF00302333
Fortin, N., Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2015). How does subjective well-being vary around the world by gender and age? In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World Happiness Report (pp. 42-75). New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In E. A. Plant & P. G. Devine (Eds.), Advances on Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1-53. Burlington: Academic Press.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Graham, C, & Chattopadhyay, S. (2013). Gender and well-being around the world. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1, 212 – 232. doi: 10.1504/IJHD.2013.055648
Gilovich, T., Kumar, A., & Jampol, L. (2015). A wonderful life: Experiential consumption and the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 152-165. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.004
Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 17922-17926. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008612107
Helliwell, J. (2011) How Can subjective well-being be improved? In F. Gorbet & A. Sharpe (Eds.), New Directions for Intelligent Government in Canada (pp. 283-304), Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2013). Comparing the happiness effects of real and on-line friends. PLoS ONE, 8: e72754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072754
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs J. (2012). World Happiness Report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs J. (2013). World Happiness Report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs J. (2015). World Happiness Report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.
Henderson, L. W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 196-221. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i3.3
Henderson, L. W., Knight, T., & Richardson, B. (2013). An exploration of the well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 322–336. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.803596
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073-1082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6
Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837-861. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3-25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
Kahneman, D. (2000). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment based approach. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 673–692). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107, 16489-16493. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3-24. doi: 10.1257/089533006776526030
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219 - 233. doi: 10.1080/17439760802303044
Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.95
Keyes, C. L., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 197-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760902844228
Kobau, R., & Sniezek, J. (2010). Well-being assessment: An evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2, 272–297, doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01035.x.
Krueger, A. B. (2009). Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1833–1845. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015
Krueger, A. B., & Stone. A. A. (2014). Progress in measuring subjective well-being: Moving toward national indicators and policy evaluations. Science, 346, 42-43. doi: 10.1126/science.1256392
Kuppens, P., Realo, A, & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 66-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168
Larsen, R.J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 17, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/BF00354108
Layard, R. (2010). Measuring subjective well-being. Science, 327, 534-535. doi: 10.1126/science.1186315
Levin, K. A., & Currie, C. (2014). Reliability and validity of an adapted version of the Cantril Ladder for use with adolescent samples. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1047-1063. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0507-4
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1246
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1091-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.005
Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 291-317). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-26126.96.36.199
Morrison, M., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Subjective well-being and national satisfaction: Findings from a worldwide survey. Psychological Science, 22, 166-171. doi: 10.117710956797610396224
Mitchell., L., Frank, M. R., Harris, K. D., Dodds, P. S., & Danforth, C. M. (2013). The geography of happiness: Connecting Twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. PLoS ONE, 8, e64417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064417
Neto, F. (1993). The Satisfaction with Life Scale: Psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 125-134. doi: 10.1007/BF01536648
O'Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Alpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Well-being and policy. Legatum Institute
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal? Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1, 195-203. doi: 10.1177/2372732214548427
Oswald A. J, & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327, 576–579. doi: 10.1126/science.1180606
Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2011). Well-being across America. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1118-1134. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00133
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-35188.8.131.52
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152. doi: 10.1080/17439760701756946
Pavot, W. G., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149-161. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17
Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25-41. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139-170. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 6, 1069-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2069
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5
Silva, A. J, & Caetano, A. (2013). Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 110, 469-478. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9938-y
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic and social progress. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 107, 9985-9990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003744107
Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number. Is that possible and desirable? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 605-629. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9204-z
Vittersø, J., & Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 326-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.584548
Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist' perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303002
Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 279-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024431
Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2014). Motivated happiness: Self-enhancement inflates self-reported subjective well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 185-194. doi: 10.1177/1948550614534699
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.