Examination of the relationship between phone usage and smartphone addiction based on certain variables

  • Ahmet Arnavut Near East University
  • Cahit Nuri Near East University
  • Cemaliye Direktor European University of Lefke
Keywords: Technology, Addiction, Technology usage, Smartphone addiction, University student


Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the relationship between technology usage and Smartphone addiction according to certain variables. Method: In this study, which was conducted with the purpose of determining the opinions of preservice teachers, a scanning model was employed. The sample of the study consists of 714 preservice teachers who studied at the Atatürk Education Faculty of Near East University, who were selected based on a random sampling method. In the study, a demographic information form prepared by the researchers was used in order to obtain the required data. The preservice teachers who participated in the study voluntarily were asked to provide information on their demographic features such as age and gender, period of using social networking sites, daily usage habits of smartphones, daily average time spent on social networking sites, average time spent using technological devices and their reasons for using smartphones. The Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Form adapted to the Turkish language by Noyan, Darcin, Nurmedov, Yılmaz and Dilbaz, (2015)and the Opinion Scale for Technological Device Usage developed by Arnavut and Bicen, (2013)  were both used. Findings: The conducted multiple regression analysis showed that the role of technology in life, communication and the usage of social media were significant predictor of smartphone addiction (F (3.709) = 282.065, p<.001). According to the obtained results, it was seen that the total variance explained 54% (R=.74, R2=.54, p<.001).A significant difference was observed in the communication dimension according to the age variable of the research (p=0.02), whereas no significant difference was found between smartphone addiction, social media usage and the role of technology in life (p<0.05). Tukey test analysis showed that the communication score increased with age. Conclusion: According to the obtained conclusions, it was found out that males predominantly use smartphones for communication purposes. No significant difference was found in terms of smartphone addiction. A high and significant relationship was found in a positive direction between smartphone addiction and social media usage. Additionally, a medium and significant relationship in a positive direction was found between smartphone addiction and the role of technology in life.



Aktaş, H., & Yılmaz, N. (2016). Smartphone addiction in terms of the elements of loneliness and shyness of university youth. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(1), 85-100. DOI: 10.24289/ijsser.283590.

Alfawareh, H. M., & Jusoh, S. (2014). Smartphones usage among unıversıty students: najran unıversıty case. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(2). DOI: 10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/B.48.

Arnavut, A. (2013). Determination of Opinions of Pre-Service teachers in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus as regards Usage of Technological Devices (Master’s Thesis). Near East University, TRNC.

Chen, K., Chen, J. V., & Yen, D. C. (2011). Dimensions of self-efficacy in the study of smart phone acceptance. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(4), 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2011.01.003

Choudrie, J., Pheeraphuttharangkoon, S., Zamani, E. & Giaglis G. (2014). Investigating the adoption and use of smartphones in the UK: a silver-surfers perspective. UH Business School Working Paper, University of Hertfordshire. http://hdl.handle.net/2299/13507.

Dirik, K. (2016). Examination of the relations between smart phone addiction and self-confidence in adolescents in terms of several variables (Master’s Thesis). Istanbul Gelisim University, Graduate School of health Sciences, Istanbul.

Dittmar, H., Long, K., & Bond, R. (2007). When a better self is only a button click away: Associations between materialistic values, emotional and identity–related buying motives, and compulsive buying tendency online. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 26(3), 334-361. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.3.334

Griffiths, M. (2001). Sex on the Internet: Observations and implications for Internet sex addiction. Journal of sex research, 38(4), 333-342. DOI: 10.1080/00224490109552104

Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 557-568. DOI: 10.1089/109493103322725333

IDC, (2017). International Data Corporation Worldwide Mobile Phone 2014–2018 Forecast and Analysis. Accessed on 7th of October, 2017.

TUIK, (2017). Turkish Statistics Institution Household Informatics Technologies Usage Research, 2004-2014. Accessed on 7th of October, 2017.

Kalkan M, & Kaygusuz C. (ed.) (2013). Internet addiction: Problems and Solutions. Ankara: Anı Publications.

Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Television addiction is no mere metaphor. Scientific American, 286(2), 74-80. Accessed on 7th of October 2017. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26059563

Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one, 8 (12), e83558. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558

Noyan, C. O., Darçın, A. E., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O., & Dilbaz, N. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version among university students. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 73-81. DOI: 10.5455/apd.176101

Owens, E. W., Behun, R. J., Manning, J. C., & Reid, R. C. (2012). The impact of Internet pornography on adolescents: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 19(1-2), 99-122. DOI: 10.1080/10720162.2012.660431

How to Cite
Arnavut, A., Nuri, C., & Direktor, C. (2018). Examination of the relationship between phone usage and smartphone addiction based on certain variables. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 34(3), 446-450. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.321351
Clinical and Health Psychology