How Sense of Agency and Sense of Ownership could Affect Anxiety: A Study Based on Virtual Hand Illusion

  • Jing Zhang Institute of Psychological Health, Hangzhou Dianzi University
  • Wei Chen Department of Psychology, Shaoxing University
  • Yanyan Qian School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University
Keywords: sense of agency, sense of ownership, anxiety, contribution style, em-pathy ability


By using computer program we created a virtual environment to study the possible impacts of sense of agency and sense of ownership on anxiety. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether our setup could achieve the similar effect as traditional rubber hand illusion had, and how sense of self (mainly sense of agency and sense of ownership) affects participants' anxiety. Study 1 the sample consisted of 24 first grade student(12 female, 12 male) aged 18-21 (M=19.98, SD=0.82), who moved a 3D virtual hand in a synchronous or asynchronous situation. Study 2 included 48 first or second grade students (24 female , 24 male) aged 18-22 (M=20.67, SD=1.05), who passed the SCL-90 rating-scale and completed the SCL-90 rating-scale again after they performed a catching/avoiding task. In study 1, all the results only provided evidence for a VHI but no other effect. Study 2 showed that asynchronous conditions had higher anxiety scores than synchronous one in terms of modality and sex, different virtual images would lead to participants' different anxious feelings. Sex itself was not a differentiating factor, however, mean and women reacted differently in different situations. Results indicated that, in general, sense of agency has more impacts on anxiety level compared with sense of ownership. However, sense of agency seemed to affect male more than female while sense of ownership placed more influence on female than on male. This finding may because the different contribution styles and empathy abilities between men and women.


Armel, K. C., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1523), 1499-1506.

Asai, T., Kanayama, N., Shu, I., Koyama, S., & Kaganoi, S. (2016). Development of embodied sense of self scale (ESSS): Exploring everyday experiences induced by anomalous self-representation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1005.

Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756.

Carruthers, G. (2013). Toward a cognitive model of the sense of embodiment in a (rubber) hand. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20, 33-60.

Ehrsson, H.H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317, 1048.

Ehrsson, H. H., Rosen, B., Stockselius, A., Ragno, C., Kohler, P., & Lundborg, G. (2008). Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain, 131, 3443-3452.

Folegatti, A., Farnè, A., Salemme, R., & de Vignemont, F. (2012). The rubber hand illusion: Two’s a company, but three's a crowd. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 799-812.

Fontaine, D., Hamani, C., & Lozano, A. (2009). Efficacy and safety of motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: Critical review of the literature. Journal of Neurosurgery, 110(2), 251-256.

Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15-31.

Germine, L., Benson, T. L., Cohen, F., & Hooker, C. I. L. (2013). Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry Research, 207(1–2), 45-52.

Guterstam, A. Abdulkaraim, Z.,& Ehrsson, H. H. (2015) Illusory ownership of an invisible body reduces autonomic and subjective social anxiety responses. Scientific Reports, 5, 9831.

Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agencyin the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(4), 196-207.

Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research, 142(1–2), 1-15.

Jenkinson, P. M., Haggard, P., Ferreira, N. C., & Fotopoulou, A. (2013). Body ownership and attention in the mirror: Insights from somatoparaphrenia and the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 51(8), 1453-1462.

Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2013). The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 604.

Morgan, H. L. (2015).Sense of agency and sense of ownership: Arguing against a dissociation and fora critical role for multisensory binding. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(3), 222-236.

Mussap, A. J., McCabe, M. P., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2008). Implications of accuracy, sensitivity, and variability of body size estimations to disordered eating. Body Image, 5(1), 80-90.

Ocklenburg, S., Peterburs, J., Rüther, N., & Güntürkün, O. (2012). The rubber hand illusion modulates pseudoneglect. Neuroscience Letters, 523(2), 158-161.

Padilla, M. A., Pabon, S., Frisoli, A., Sotgiu, E., Loconsole, C., & Bergamasco, M. (2010). Hand and arm ownership illusion through virtual reality physical interaction and vibrotactile stimulations. In A. Kappers, J. Van Erp, W. Tiest & F. Van Der Helm (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6192, pp. 194-199). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.

Ramakonar, H., Franz, E. A., & Lind, C. R. P. (2011). The rubber hand illusion and its application to clinical neuroscience. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 18(12), 1596-1601.

Sørensen, J. B. Ø. (2005). The alien-hand experiment. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 73-90.

Rim, Y. (1990). Styles of attribution and of coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(9), 973-976.

Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Spanlang, B., Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M., & Slater, M. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS One, 5(4), e10381.

Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., & Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS One, 4(7), e6185.

Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2008). Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 6.

Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 80-91.

Tsakiris, M. (2016). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1-28. DOI 10.1080/17470218.2016.1181768

Wang, A., Chiang, J. T., Tsai, C., Lin, T., & Cheng, B. (2013). Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 101-113.

Yuan, Y., & Steed, A. (2010). Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? IEEE Virtual Reality, 95-102.

Zhang, J.,& Chen, W. (2016). Is body image plastic? The impact of synchrony and distance reference frame on body ownership. Acta Psychologica Sinica 48(8), 933-945.

Zhang, J., Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). The virtual hand illusion is moderated by context-induced spatial reference frames. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1659.

How to Cite
Zhang, J., Chen, W., & Qian, Y. (2018). How Sense of Agency and Sense of Ownership could Affect Anxiety: A Study Based on Virtual Hand Illusion. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 34(3), 430-437.
Clinical and Health Psychology