Motivational Orientations of High-Achieving Students as Mediators of a Positive Perception of a High-Achieving Classmate: Results from a Cross-national Study

Hyerim Oh, Maria del Mar Badia-Martín, Sheyla Blumen, Julie Maakrun, Quoc An-Thu Nguyena, Niamh Stack, Margaret Sutherland, Catherine Wormald, Albert Ziegler

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to explore whether and in what ways high-achieving school students’ motivational orientations influence their perceptions of a fictitious future high-achieving classmate. The final sample consisted of the 396 highest achieving students out of a sample from 1794 seventh and tenth graders from five countries: Australia, Peru, South Korea, Spain, and Vietnam. A series of stepwise regression models were used to test the hypothesis that positive perceptions of a high-achieving classmate might be mediated by an approach motivation, but not by an avoidance motivational orientation. The hypothesis was generally confirmed. Learning goal orientation and performance approach motivation predicted positive perceptions of a high-achieving classmate’s intellectual ability, social qualities and popularity among peers, whereas a performance avoidance orientation was usually uncorrelated. However, sporadic exceptions have been found among the participants from Vietnam, South Korea, and Peru.


Keywords


motivational orientation, high-achievers, country differences.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bagès, C. & Martinot, D. (2011). What is the best model for girls and boys faced with a standardized mathematics evaluation situation: A hardworking role model or a gifted role model? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 536–543.

Baker; J.A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998/2011). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 5-15. doi: 10.1177/001698629804200102

Behling, O., & Law, K.S. (2000) Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2003). The Devaluation Effect: Activating a need devalues unrelated objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 463–473. doi:10.1086/346243

Brophy, J. (2005). Goal Theorists Should Move on From Performance Goals. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 167–176. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3

Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 557–572. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557

Fiedler, E.D., Lange, R. E., Winebrenner, S. (1993). In search of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 4-7.

Händel, M., Duan, X., Sutherland, M. & Ziegler, A. (2014). Successful in science and still popular: A pattern that is possible in China rather than in Germany or Russia. International Journal of Science Education. 36, 887–907. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.830232

Händel, M., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2013). Student perceptions of high achieving classmates. High Ability Studies, 24, 99-114.

Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 904–915. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.904

Heise, D. R. (2010). Surveying cultures: Discovering shared conceptions and sentiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lee, S.-Y. (2002). The effects of peers on the academic and creative talent development of a gifted adolescent male. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2002, 14(1), 19-29. doi: 10.4219/jsge-2002-387

Lockwood, P. & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91

Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2000). The influence of goals on value and choice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 39, 97–128.

Neumeister, K. L. S., & Finch, H. (2006). Perfectionism in High-Ability Students: Relational Precursors and Influences on Achievement Motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 238–251. doi:10.1177/001698620605000304

Person, R. S. (2010). Experiences of intellectually gifted Students in an egalitarian and inclusive educational system: A survey study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 536-569.

Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 280-282. doi:10.1177/0016986209346946

Piechowski, M.M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo and G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd edition, pp. 366 – 381). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

Read, D., & van Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 189–205. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2803

Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.) (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Salili, , F., Chiu, C., & Lai, S. (2001). The influence of culture and context on students’ motivational orientation and performance. In F Salili, C.Y. Chiu, & Y.Y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 221-248). New York: Plenum.

Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116

Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Article first published online: 7 Jan 2016. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12371

Smith, T.W. (2004). Developing and evaluating cross-national survey instruments. In: Presser S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., et al. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 431—452). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley.

Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the Process of Stereotype Threat: A Review of Mediational Variables and New Performance Goal Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 177–206. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034020.20317.89

Stopper, M. (Ed.) (2000). Meeting the social and emotional needs of gifted and talented children. London: NACE/ David Fulton Publishers.

Tao, V., & Hong, Y.Y. (2000). A meaning system approach to Chinese students’ achievement goals. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1(2), 13-38.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.

Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., & Stoeger, H. (2008). Addressees of performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 643–654. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.643




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259451

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (Spain)

Open AccessSello de Calidad FECyT 2013Thomson-Reuters-JCRScielo-Españadoajscimago